Past Watkins stand in this pontion. Buthie Jormation of the li
Establishment,
A
in the time,
Si
Hey Bottingen, it was positively announced) deepher
30 Dec 13 and
#
*
^3 fand (4) that it was not the intention of the the fuellin "Gor to provide andunces for any of Offices at H. King except the Governor. Notwithstanding the seclaration ofthis rule. Sii J. Dairs permitted it to be infringed buy St. Peader without assigning sug for the indulgence shewn hom! and, when
St P. applied for an
his application,
on the
refused
advantage of.
reson
accgmentation of salary, that he had the Lt. Pedder having
ground house .
Mained Authority for having
a house Ecar
ttees
free complained that a deduction cous Made from his Salary for rent - and Office referring to the sauction Macried
and feretters from Lord Stauley, general rate that Officers
the
were not
that he had
have houses at the public repense permitted him to have the money paid for rent returned to him – which of course, relieved him also prom future rrent. bith this precedent fapt Wethers
314
being
now seeks for scicular favor thurned out of the denement occupied
- until lately by himself, s previously St. Pedder. But to me it seems
Leg
that this claion ory
let not to bee
Acquiesced in. I think it was a
Mistake in /45 to have Mlored the
sidurence y
house rent pee to be
of Podde in the face up the roulation, &
that we ought not now to persistente
wild
it. If the rule is a Morved to the infringed again I think it were be best to with draw it alleyther. I have
only
to and that I find, from the Blue Book, that the following Officers have residences inued for
them.
Superintenant y. Police
this
Keay less in Building hired as
ifistant Superintendant) a Central Police
Station.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.